Nepalese are still wary of the territorial loss due to the 1962 war between China and India caused them. They do not want the Doklam stand-off to spin out of control
“If two elephants fight, the grass underneath them will get crushed. If the same elephants make love, even in their bonhomie, the grass will get crushed,” says Hari Sharma, an eminent political scientist and author, while sitting in a cafe on Kathmandu’s Durbar Marg. Politicians and foreign policy analysts alike have repeatedly used the same analogy to outline the costs of an India-China war for Nepal. If the tensions persist or aggravate between its two neighbours, there is a chance that the fallout will spill over from Bhutan to Nepal. The Kathmandu-elite is watching the events unfolding in Bhutan with eyes peeled.
Nepal has been on fire before because of war between India and China. “Smaller countries might be affected the worst, they might be swallowed in such a war,” explains Madhesi activist CK Lal to Hardnews and adds, “There has been the issue of Lipulekh where Nepal’s sovereignty was compromised.” In 1962, when the war between India and China came to an end, Lipulekh pass, which connects India and China through Nepal, became contested territory. India positioned its troops to guard the pass and played deaf to the Himalayan country’s protests to the extent that Nepali diplomats went to India Office Records at The British Library in London to find evidence of territorial ownership. There has been a growing chorus in the Nepali press over the Lipulekh issue, cautioning the public of the dire consequences of war. Nepal was once again left out of the conversation in 2015 when India and China, in a time of better relations, decided to increase trade through the Lipulekh pass.
“The fight between China and India would be disastrous for both the countries. There is too much at stake for China, they need the Indian market and won’t risk a war. Tensions between the two countries can help Nepal beat India with a stick,”
An aide to former Nepali Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai explained to Hardnews that there were two types of people watching the face-off and the subsequent skirmishes in Doklam: “The first are those who are seeing it with curiosity and the second type, which includes Nepali people, are watching it with trepidation.” The former he associates with the west and the latter with the neighbourhood.
Ambedkar's legacy and his role in shaping India's Constitution face persistent criticism from the BJP…
Argentinian President Milei's reforms inspire Trump, Musk; Argentina seeks stronger trade ties with India.
Misinformation about the violence against the Hindus after Sheikh Hasina was ousted as PM is…
Congress struggles to maintain support, winning sometimes but failing to retain it in subsequent elections
The detente between India and China is beneficial for both sides but there are several…
Stronger social media regulation for Indian children would protect them from harm in a largely…